TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Terry Westley <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 22:20:01 -0800
Reply-To: Kihup Boo <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Kihup Boo <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (47 lines)
"SIGAda-Web Services" may attract a lot of attentions from
the Internet app development communities.

- Ki

----- Original Message -----
From: Terry Westley <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:25 PM
Subject: reviving web ada group

> OK, one more time...  (traffic has been so sparse lately ;-)
> It appears (to me) that there is enough interest to revive the
> Web Ada group, although perhaps with a slightly modified or
> expanded purpose.
> It's been suggested by several that the ACM SIGAda mailing list
> is a good basis for a discussion group perhaps later to become a
> chartered working group.  I think this is a good compromise
> because some (like me) don't read comp.lang.ada regularly and
> others don't like commercial groups such as Yahoo Groups.
> I propose that the Web Ada mailing list be revived to discuss
> the purpose of such a group and whether there is enough
> interest to begin a working group.
> Currie Colket has suggested that ACM would prefer a name of
> the form SIGAda-Web rather than web_ada and I'm happy to go
> along with that.  However, the scope of this group may be
> broader than just the Web.  So, the purpose of my email here
> is to solicit the opinion of those who would be interested
> in joining such a group to suggest names for the mailing list,
> and perhaps ultimately a working group.
> Ideas?
>    1) SIGAda-Web
>    2) SIGAda-Internet
>    3) SIGAda-Net
>    4) SIGAda-other?
> Thanks for your input.
> --Terry Westley, [log in to unmask]