TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X-cc:
"Paige, Emmett Jr., , OSD/C3I +" <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask], Herm Fischer <[log in to unmask]>, Carol LeDoux <[log in to unmask]>, Jim Alstad <[log in to unmask]>, Ed Colbert - SIGAda Ada Awareness Manager <[log in to unmask]>, Judy Kerner <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask], J M JR Youmans <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask], Sy Wong <[log in to unmask]>, Bryce Bardin <[log in to unmask]>, Winsor Brown <[log in to unmask]>, Ray Toal - LMU & LA ACM Treasurer <[log in to unmask]>, Barry Boehm <[log in to unmask]>, David Shochat <[log in to unmask]>, Jock Rader - Hughes <[log in to unmask]>, Liz Manderfield <[log in to unmask]>, Ed Manderfield - LA SIGAda Program Chair <[log in to unmask]>, Lee Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>, Curtis Bradley - SIGAda Treasurer <[log in to unmask]>, Sean McNeil <[log in to unmask]>, George Huling <[log in to unmask]>, Rick Hefner <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Mar 1997 13:17:59 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Fri, 14 Mar 1997 13:03:12 EST. <v01540b03af4ef9ce4c6f@[155.31.69.251]>
X-To:
Robert Firth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
>...
>However, that said, the present situation finds me deeply distressed.
>For I believe that what is going to happen is that the DoD will abandon
>its insistence on the HOW, and replace it, not with an insistence on
>the WHAT, but rather with nothing.

It might be even WORSE than that, Robert: Some customers will replace
the official HOW (Ada) with a worse ad-hoc HOW rather than implemented
this intended non-How.  There are a lot of Captains, Majors, &
Colonels out there who will respond to Mr. Paige's decision by
insisting on C or C++ now irregardless of every other system/software
engineering consideration.  They've been waiting for this excuse.
(Actually, many of them have not waited and have ignored policy, but
this will make them bolder and the Ada champions handicapped -- what
happened to soldiers blindly following orders?)

Raise your hand if you haven't worked a contract this decade with at
least one of those "thinkers" in your customer shop (or in Robert's
case, it's "living with the enemy"?).  Mine's down.


Other than that, what's to disagree with in your thoughtful, well
stated message, Robert?  But, we keep preachin' to the choir.

        -- Hal

ATOM RSS1 RSS2