TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:13:53 -0400
Reply-To:
Richard Conn <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Richard Conn <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Seems like the thread has served its purpose.  Everyone is worn down,
and we have concluded that everyone has the right to declare anything
a standard at any time.  Everyone else has a right to choose to apply
that standard or not.

====================================
Richard Conn, Principal Investigator
Reuse Tapestry


-----Original Message-----
From: Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Hal Hart
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 6:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Standards


Richard Conn wrote:

> Hal,
>
> Just in case you missed it, this is the text of what Mike said:
> ...

RICK:  I did not miss it.  That msg was the basis for his proposing the
compromise in this forum of using the adjectives to at least clarify the
different usages of the word "standard" and not have to argue about right vs
wrong.  You recall that I replied applauding that proposal (so we could end
this
thread).  You seem to be rejecting it, right?   -Hal

ATOM RSS1 RSS2