TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Lundquist <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Lundquist <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Oct 1998 12:17:56 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
From:  Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>

> [said Ron]
> >
> > 3)  The language is too large, or too verbose, etc.  This was always
> >     (IMHO) a fictional argument.  The language is so much like Pascal,
> >     so regular, and so well documented that what seems like it should
> >     work normally does work and if it works one way doing one thing it
> >     works the same way doing something else.
>
> C++ is less verbose?

C'mon... he wasn't taking that position (read the second sentence).

> [etc...]

I think Ron was answering in the vein of "here is some of what people
say about Ada and some of what I think about it," not "these are the
disadvantages of Ada"...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2