TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-To:
Roger Racine <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Apr 1999 10:31:37 -0400
Reply-To:
Ed Falis <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ed Falis <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
-----Original Message-----
>From: Roger Racine <[log in to unmask]>
>>Are you sure the real reason is that they need data to prove
>>that a pure Ada project is cheaper than a non-Ada project?
>>
>
>Quite sure.  I was told that none of the software could be written in Ada,
>even if it came as part of a COTS product.  I believe at least part of the
>reason is that this manager thinks that Ada-knowledgeable people are too
>scarce to be able to maintain the system for a reasonable cost.
>
>Roger Racine
>

Gotta love those self-fulfilling prophecies.

- ed

ATOM RSS1 RSS2