TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
James Squire <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:39:04 -0800
Reply-To:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
Jim,

Your point about availability of personnel is noted. I agree with you
that this can be used as a reason not to use Ada.

Since I am in the business of training people to be able to do Ada, I am
not all that sympathetic toward those who invoke this excuse. In my
experience, if a programmer already knows C++, the transition to Ada
is not very difficult.

Those of us, including you, who have been programming for a long time
learn that the programming languages keep changing but we continue to
acquire the skills we need as we go.  The fact that the personnel do
not know Ada should not be an obstacle.  However, I realize it is often
used as an excuse to select some other language.

Richard


[log in to unmask]
AdaWorks Software Engineering
Suite 30
2555 Park Boulevard
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(650) 328-1815
FAX  328-1112

ATOM RSS1 RSS2