>> You and several other people have said that a language perceived as
>> great for safety critical applications won't even be considered for
>> non-safety critical applications.
>You are implicating that this is a false assumtion. Unfortunately,
>it is, in my experience at least, the reality.
Sorry, no -- I didn't mean to suggest that at all. Based on what you
and others have said I fully believe you are correct that this is a
common assumption. I just wanted to understand it better -- just what
is the negative baggage that is associated with "safety critical?"
>Alas, if I knew how to get the business case across in a few lines
>in a flyer, I would probably be a marketeer, not an engineer... :-)
I don't know Jerry -- your business case looks pretty pursuasive to
me. You could be a good marketeer (no offense) ;-)
Jeff Burns, Director of Marketing
One Hopkins Place
Ithaca, NY 14850
e-mail: [log in to unmask]