TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:33:53 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (26 lines)

--  .. now primarily used for defence and aerospace systems
--  ...
--  .. for SE but the academic and commercial markets do not agree ..

I believe that Ada has a fair share in telecommunications, but have no hard
facts to support my claim. It is interesting to note though that for
embedded (fx. small noisy handheld devices) most agree that C++ and/or Java
are not the best tools. People brought up in these environments - especially
on PC's - has to be heavily "de-programmed" to be able to produce useable
code. See fx.
for some statements on this. Lack of Ada support lib's for fx. the Palm
platforms is a BIG problem and most developers has choosen to go "backward"
to C again.

--  .. I do not think that the central message of the book ..

I can only agree. Programming is only a (very) small part of SW Engineering.
We have good use of your excellent book - both with and without Ada code in

regards  /søren
Søren Henssel-Rasmussen
Nokia Mobile Phones, R&D Copenhagen