Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:07:50 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Put it to rest? And get real work done?? ;-)
====================================
Richard Conn, Principal Investigator
Reuse Tapestry
-----Original Message-----
From: Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Craig Spannring
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 7:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Standards
The Prentice-Hall Dictionary of Computing as a couple of errors in
it's definition of what a standard is. It should read-
STANDARDS.
Clearly defined and agreed-upon conventions for programming
interfaces. Standards may be-
- proprietary (Designed to benefit a single vendor, usually the
dominant player in the field, for the sole benefit
of that vendor)
- industry (Designed to benefit multiple vendors
in a given field, usually aimed at reducing
the dominance of the lead player in the field)
- public (Designed to benefit the public.)
- formal (developed by a standards organization such as ANSI or
ISO with the primary goal of benefiting the standards
organization)
Now that we have a definition of the four types of standards, could we
put this thread to rest?
For the humor and sarcasm impaired, add a :-) and a :-( to this post.
--
=======================================================================
Life is short. | Craig Spannring
Bike hard, ski fast. | [log in to unmask]
--------------------------------+------------------------------------
When all you've got is Perl, everything feels like a smashed thumb
=======================================================================
|
|
|