TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Robert I. Eachus" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Nov 1996 17:02:24 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> (message from Tucker Taft on Tue, 5 Nov 1996 16:06:36 -0500)
Reply-To:
"Robert I. Eachus" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
   Tucker Taft ([log in to unmask]) said:

  > Admittedly, if there is no mandate for a particular technology
  > in a particular domain, then a business case must be made for the
  > use of one technology over another.  I certainly expect and hope
  > that Ada will continue to be used in many domains that don't relate
  > even vaguely to war-fighting.  That doesn't necessarily mean it should
  > be mandated in all such domains.

  One that has pleasantly surprised me recently is the use of Ada for
cgi scripts.  Much, much easier on the head than /bin/sh or perl5, and
the code is the same size or smaller.  The "neat trick" that makes it
all work is to get and use the uncgi tool to unpack the href into
environment variables.


                                        Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2