TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Alan and Carmel Brain <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 14:40:58 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Alan and Carmel Brain <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (10 lines)
From: "Mike Stark" <[log in to unmask]>

> I echo Stephe Leake's sentiments (envy? ;) for being in an organization
> that is using Ada.  Is that an uphill battle, a straightforward analysis &
> decision, or is it to the point where Ada is just assumed to be the best
> language for the problem at hand?

The last. It's avionics. It's real-time. Failure isn't an option. So it's
Ada-95.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2