TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Wojtek Narczynski <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:57:16 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (27 lines)
Wes,

>> It's disappointing to say the least, but
>> I'm going down the c++ path. I'm not doing
>> any conversion, simply identifying key
>> functionality and redesigning it in c++
>> on an as needed basis.

>To each his own.  Java, I can tolerate,
>(just barely) but if C++ were my only option,
>I would leave the software industry.

Oh, java has problems:

1. deficiency of Java is lack of generics / templates.
2. is the lack of operator overloading
3. The "java performance" oxymoron seen everywhere.
4. Have you read this article, for example?
http://www.holub.com/javaone/holub_threads.pdf
(...)

By that I am not saying that C++ is better.


Regards,
Wojtek

ATOM RSS1 RSS2