TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Dave Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 08:51:04 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To: Dave Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (11 lines)
>
> > * Java is a small language (not necessarily an advantage, but certainly a difference)
> > * Java is "pure" OO. This is probably the biggest technical advantage of Java
> > over Ada. A hybrid language like Ada95 or C++ tends to be the worst of two worlds.

Where is it written that "pure OO" is a necessary or even
desirable goal?  I believe in mixing the gene pool.

-- Dave Wood, Aonix
-- Product Manager, ObjectAda for Windows

ATOM RSS1 RSS2