TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ian Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ian Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Jun 1997 09:47:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Am I the only one that sees the (hopefully) irony in Flight Safety's location?

>Just thought I'd let you know that my boss has closed the debate
>and officially decided to go with C++.  The final straw was the NRC "Ada
>and Beyond" report issued last November.  He saw many of his concerns
>voiced there and interpreted the overall message of the report as
>"Don't use Ada unless you're developing warfighting software."
>Mike Bates               FlightSafety International, Simulation Systems
>Computer Systems Group   Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012

ATOM RSS1 RSS2