TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 11:20:21 -0800
From: Gary Kephart <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Investment Technology Group, Inc. - http://www.itginc.com
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (30 lines)
Marie A. Lenzi, in an editorial for "Doc" (which I picked up at OOPSLA
97), writing about Java, said

Another dangerous little bit of goings-on is this "we wrote the
product in Java in three months" syndrome. This was a pretty
hefty piece of technology - how was this possible? Then you
realize that it was a rewrite of an already deployed applica-
tion. The requirements were already defined, it was already
designed, architected, tested, documented, etc. All the
painstaking work involved in the development process had
already been done. All they did was reimplemented in Java.
  Now, if this was originally a true object-oriented product,
written in say, Smalltalk, maybe C++ or Ada, for example,
then it might be fine, however, the rewrite effort still was
horribly understated. If this was previously a significantly
sized procedural product, and they rewrote the beauty in 3
months - well, that's scary.


Gary

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Kephart, Software Engineer  |  Investment Technology Group, Inc
Phone: (213)270-7544             |  400 Corporate Pointe, Suite 855
Fax:   (310)216-0933             |  Culver City, CA 90230
mailto:[log in to unmask]        |  http://www.itginc.com
Team Ada member                  |  "The Future of Trading"

Disclaimer: these are my opinions, not ITG's.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2