TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 18 Dec 1998 01:24:00 EST
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
 [log in to unmask] (Jerry van Dijk) quoted and then wrote:

>> >Really, I don't mind the safety-critical, high-integrity angle.  But it
>> >would be nice to develop grass-roots support for Ada among those who
>> >aren't necessarily in that domain.
>>
>> Safety-critical may be optional, but I have no interest in attracting
>> Ada advocates who are not interested in high-integrity.  It is quite
>> possible to write lousy software in Ada, and the reputation of Ada is
>> best preserved by not attracting those who want to go in that direction.
>
>Are you _really_ saying that people like me should resign from this list
>and stop using Ada and leave you high and mighty people who do the
>really important work alone ?

Hmmm, I just don't understand what I said that might have given offense.
High-integrity to me means software that does what is needed for the
purpose
at hand, reliably, day in and day out.  If your interests are otherwise, I
doubt that you would be on this list.

Larry Kilgallen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2