TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 11:02:06 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia
From: Geoff Bull <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (23 lines)
Richard Conn wrote:
> Just in case you missed it, this is the text of what Mike said:
> My Prentice-Hall Dictionary of Computing says (1998, p.627):
> Clearly defined and agreed-upon conventions for programming
> intefaces. Standards may be (bullets mine)
> - proprietary (used only within the environment provided by a single
>   computer vendor),
> - public (widely used across a variety of vendor equipment), or
> - formal (developed by a standards organization such as ANSI or ISO)."

Given that a formal standard exists for C++ it would seem strange
to refer to a a proprietary implementation as Microsoft's standard
for C++ (Would you say Gnat is the ACT standard for Ada?).
If there are two "standards" then clearly there is no standard.