TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"j.m.kamrad.ii" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
j.m.kamrad.ii
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 1997 10:29:23 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>What there is instead is an equal and opposite mandate known as
>anti-mandatism that will flock to C/C++ because these languages are more
>"fun".

Please explain to me why C/C++ is considered "fun" to use.  I know what is
fun in software development -- going through software integration and test
with no major problems.  I have had significantly more "fun" with Ada than
other languages.  And other empirical evidence also bears this out.  So
what "fun" am I missing in these languages???

mike

------------------------------------
Mike Kamrad
Computing Devices International         [log in to unmask]
M/S BLC W2J                             1.612.921.6908
8800 Queen Avenue South                 FAX: 1.612.921.6552
Bloomington MN 55431

ATOM RSS1 RSS2