Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Harbaugh, John S |
Date: | Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:03:39 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Robin -
This is one of those Ada trivia issues that no one remembers until they bump into it a few times.
RM 4.3.3(32) =>
NOTES
32 10 In an array_aggregate, positional notation may only be used with two or more expressions; a single expression in parentheses is interpreted as a parenthesized_expression. A named_array_aggregate, such as (1 => X), may be used to specify an array with a single component.
Not quite as hard and fast as the similar requirement for single-component records, RM 4.3.1(7). Perhaps one of the language gurus could explain the differences between record and array aggregates.
Cheers,
- John Harbaugh
> ----------
> From: rreagan[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To: rreagan
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 1:35 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Constant arrays of one element.
>
> Hi,
> I am trying to write a code generator for our project and the following
> gets a compiler
> error on both GNAT v3.12 and GreenHills v1.8.9.
> ...
> type My_Array_Type is array( positive range <> ) of integer;
> ...
> A_const_array : constant My_Array_Type := ( 16#1234# ); --<<< line 407
>
> while this does not get an error:
>
> A_const_array : constant My_Array_Type := ( 16#1234#, 16#1234# );
>
> GHS output:
>
> Error: line 407 col 4 LRM:8.6(28), Expression has no possible
> interpretation as an expression of the expected type My_Array_Type,
> Continuing
>
> I assume that because both compilers rejected the same statement that they
> are correct, but why can't it interpret a single element array. The LRM
> 8.6(28) is not the most enlightening text :).
>
> Robin P. Reagan - Software Engineer [log in to unmask]
> SEAKR Engineering, Inc. v-303.649.1763x10
> 12847 East Peakview Avenue f-303.649.1326
> Englewood, CO 80011
> "Imagination is more important than knowledge" -Albert Einstein-
>
|
|
|