TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeffrey Carter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeffrey Carter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:31:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Wojtek Narczynski wrote:
 >
 > But IMHO the whole UML is "The Emperorís New Suit" (by Hans Christian
 > Andersen), if you know what I mean.

I don't know if I'd go that far. UML is primarily a requirements
notation, and does not seem to me as well suited for design as for
requirements. It also has a lot of diagrams, each of which adds only a
little information. The reader has to understand each of those many
diagrams and integrate them in his head to understand the system. I
would much prefer a notation with fewer diagrams, each of which conveys
more information.

--
Jeff Carter
"Whatever it is, I'm against it."
Horse Feathers

ATOM RSS1 RSS2