Rush,
> I happen to agree with your statements that Ada productivity is
> equal or better than C++ (after a learning curve) and Ada
> maintenance MUCH easier. But such statements can easily be
> dismissed as unsubstantiated.
As "C++ is equal or better than Ada" can easily be dismissed as
unsubstantiated :)
I agree with you, but I've seen a lot of time that for chosing
C++ you don't have to give data and facts that it is ok for the
project, but for Ada you must ! The choice is really biased :)
Pascal.
--|------------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member |
--| |
--| EDF-DER-IPN-SID- T T I |
--| Intranet: http://cln46gb |
--| Bureau N-023 e-mail: [log in to unmask] |
--| 1 Av Général de Gaulle voice : +33-1-47.65.50.91 |
--| 92141 Clamart CEDEX fax : +33-1-47.65.50.07 |
--| FRANCE |
--|------------------------------------------------------------
--|
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"