TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Apr 1998 17:00:32 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> > The only technical problem with it is the missing
> > a bunch of interfaces. There is no standard way to light up dots,
> > get ppp or serial bytes or keystrokes, or do the standard containers
> > and communications classes.
>
> This is, IMHO, not a technical but a commercial/political problem:
> we (= the Ada community at large) seem unable to agree on a single,
> even de-facto, standard. Maybe we are all to much perfectionists...

Or maybe our "problem" is we're too smart for our own good.  A lot of the
folks "out there" don't think much about "standards." They either pick one
of 15 incompatible methods of doing whatever, or they hack out number 16
.....

ATOM RSS1 RSS2