TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:52:59 GMT
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> (message from james hopper on Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:33:54 -0500)
X-To:
Reply-To:
Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
> From: james hopper <[log in to unmask]>

>                              i found that the gnat version of
> sockets is really slow compared to the adasockets stuff.

Interesting, I wonder why, most of it seems to be a pretty thin
binding over the C or OS socket calls .. was this on OS X?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2