TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:47:32 -0500
Reply-To: Scott Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <v03130300b31c2ee5c318@[]> from "John P. Woodruff" at "Mar 22, 1999 09:38:25 am"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Scott Ingram <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (30 lines)
So then, John P. Woodruff says this:
> I'm not so sure that it's time for Draconian measures on the basis of
> today's experience.  I don't think one inappropriate message (granted, with
> several echoes) merits significant changes to policy.  Let's wait a bit to
> see if the situation persists.
> Besides, if the list were about to become substantially different, surely
> the psychic would have mentioned that fact in her message  ;-)
> --
> John Woodruff                                   N I F   \ ^ /
> Lawrence Livermore National Lab               =====---- < o >
> 925 422 4661                                            / v \

I agree with John.  After taking a closer look at the message
headers I am convinced that there is no "Silvia Brown" and that
its quite likely that GTE.NET's mailservice was exploited to
forward this message so that the true sender could remain
anonymous.  I do intend to find out who the telephone service
provider is and complain to them.  (T'would be a delicous irony
if it turns out to be GTE :)

Scott Ingram
Sonar Processing and Analysis Laboratory
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory