TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 13:01:13 -0500
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
> Which doesn't mean that you shouldn't send him an e-mail pointing out
> how the designers who:
> >"... are fatalistic about the possibility of eliminating bugs."
> are simply ignorant of Ada.

Even though the article's nearly two years old, I will.  And I'll ask why
he failed to mention Ada (or even some other language that's less of a
pariah than Ada), since it has all Java's "safety features" and more,
without the speed problem he made so much of.

If I can find a good e-mail address.

--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau

ATOM RSS1 RSS2