TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 08:26:18 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
> the authors talk about UML <-> Ada and say things like "There is
> currently no known means ..."  and "We know of no means..."
> about generating Ada from UML or UML from Ada.  ....

I hope Rational speaks up, since my knowledge is sketchy.
The Rational Rose OO modeling tool uses UML.  The tool is very
C++ oriented, but it cna generate Ada 95 from the Rose diagrams.
That's as detailed as I can get.  Back to you, Rational.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2