TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 May 2000 15:21:09 +1000
Reply-To:
Subject:
From:
Geoff Bull <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization:
Canon Information Systems Research Australia
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Dale Stanbrough wrote:
>
> >
> >BTW, using page count as a metric, C99 has a bloat factor almost identical
> >to that of Ada95.
>
> yes, but doesn't the standard include things that are not included in
> the AdaLRM, such as locales?
>
yes, but doesn't Ada include things not included in C: tasking, generics,
distributed programming, packages, type extension, range constraints,
fixed point types, rep clauses, etc etc etc etc.

My point was you can't call Ada bloat-ware without also calling C bloat-ware.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2