TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Kester, Rush W." <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:25:44 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-To: "Criley, Marc A" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: "Kester, Rush W." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (27 lines)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Criley, Marc A [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 12:00 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: "Why Not Ada"
>I read through the comments posted at the SlashDot site, and some of the
>misinformation was so mind-bogglingly ludicrous that it warranted its own
>Douglas Adams' metaphors.  I was embarrassed for some of the contributors
>that they not just believed, but would actually post, such foolishness.
>Did you know that early Ada compilers could only recognize 48 characters?
>That the language was so complex that it was years before a "certified"
>compiler could be produced?  (Well, that one might actually be true ;-)

As true as the statement that it took years to get a certified Ada compiler
might be, how long did it take to get the first certified C or C++ compiler?

Rush Kester
Charter member Team Ada
Software Systems Engineer
AdaSoft at Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab.
email:  [log in to unmask]
phone: (240) 228-3030 (live M-F 9:30am-4:30pm, voicemail anytime)
fax:   (240) 228-6779