Wed, 19 May 1999 06:55:03 -0400
|
Samuel (Mize) said:
" If the engineering processes and testing strategies are strong
enough to
> provide confidence in the face of typos, mental bobbles and occasional
> bad decisions, they are certainly strong enough to provide confidence
> while using a less-than-validated compiler. Indeed, any weapon system
> developed with C or Jovial must have been able to do so."
>
Actually, JOVIAL (J73) compilers were validated by the Language
Control
Facility at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. There was a very
specific Air
Force requirement that only validated JOVIAL compilers were to be
used.
As a matter of fact, the JOVIAL Compiler Validation System (JCVS)
still
exists, and my organization will test JOVIAL compilers if anyone
wishes.
To a lesser extent, C compilers were validated by the National
Institute
of Standards and Technology until a year or so ago. Such vendors as
DEC and IBM (primarily those doing business with the Government)
had validated C compilers. Again, my organization offers validation
services for C compilers (as well as C++ compilers) if anyone is
interested.
Phil Brashear
EDS Conformance Testing Center
4646 Needmore Road, Bin 46
P.O. Box 24593
Dayton, OH 45424-0593
(937) 237-4510
[log in to unmask]
www.eds-conform.com
>
|
|
|