TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: James Squire <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 15:16:14 -0600
Organization: McDonnell Douglas Aerospace
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (21 lines)
Tucker Taft wrote:

> Conversely, the committee felt that Ada has proven to be an excellent
> 3GL for the creation of the high-assurance, real-time systems in the
> DoD.  Vigorously promoting the continued use of Ada in this domain
> makes excellent business sense, particularly if the current unsatisfactory
> "waiver" process is folded into a more encompassing Software
> Engineering/Architecture Review process...

Sounds excellent!

I'll believe it when I see it.
James Squire           mailto:m193884 no junk mail
[log in to unmask]
MDA Avionics Tools & Processes
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace    
Opinions expressed here are my own and NOT my company's
"I could strangle that damn G'Kar."
        -- Sinclair, "The War Prayer"