TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 May 2002 06:39:27 +0100
In-Reply-To:
X-To:
Reply-To:
Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
> From: "C. Daniel Cooper" <[log in to unmask]>

> 2) Language Revision
> --------------------
> This issue naturally leads to the question: can the next language
> revision for Ada provide the missing guarantee, assuring a match
> in comparisons of subprogram access values that designate the same
> subprogram?

Perhaps we could make pragma Export (Ada, ...) do what you want?
(pragma Import has additional semantics for convention Ada).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2