TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "(No Name Available)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 13:59:38 -0400
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (18 lines)
[log in to unmask] (Paul D. Stachour) wrote:
>Unfortunately for our profession, many of the people who call themselves
>software engineers know only one language, for one OS, one one hardware.
>To carry Matt's anology, I'd hardly call a person a civil engineer if
>all (s)he knew how to do was build two-lane bridges for 1 car-at-atime
>traffic on lightly traveled rural roads!

And I would not call someone a civil engineer if she could not build any
road without using at least 8 lanes.  Deciding how much effort to expend
is important for cost control, and it would not be good for the world to
Ada as a language which could only be used for expensive projects.

If one has no need for tasking or inheritance, Ada still gives great
(defects avoided) with its strong typing.