TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 19:29:03 EST
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
[log in to unmask] (Jerry van Dijk) wrote:

>My first impression is: obviously a great language for safety critical
>applications. We do not build safety critical applications, so... we
>stick to C++ (or JAVA, or...)
>
>Does anyone else get the same impression or is this just me again ?

I get the feeling that those are highly reliable software projects,
and I would like my work to be that reliable even if it is used for
less critical projects.

Larry Kilgallen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2