TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Dec 1998 17:02:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Here is one more attempt on the "no room for error" paragraph.
The goal of the changes was to reach out past the safety critical
community, to the "business-critical" community.
-Tuck

----------

                When there is no room for error...
                          Choose Ada.

  Systems delivered using Ada have significantly lower error rates.
  This is because the Ada language supports all the most modern and
  effective software engineering techniques, while Ada compilers, right
  out of the box, provide more compile-time and run-time consistency
  checking than those for other programming languages.  Ada compilers
  catch errors when they are least expensive to fix, before system
  integration time and deployment.  This is why companies in all kinds
  of industries, including Financial Systems, Power Generation, Healthcare,
  Transportation, and Communications, trust Ada for their bet-the-business,
  software-intensive systems.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2