TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dirk Craeynest <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:30:25 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Dirk Craeynest <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
FYI, there's a thread entitled "RTeal-time Ada Programming Rules ?"
in the comp.realtime newsgroup.

Some of you more eloquent then I am, might want to respond to the
misinformation spread there about the "wretched performance" of "lots
of [] Ada idioms" in general and the unsuitability of Ada tasking in
particular...

Dirk ([log in to unmask] for Ada-Belgium/Europe/WG9 mail)

*** 10th Intl.Conf.on Reliable Software Technologies - Ada-Europe'2005
*** June 20-24, 2005 ***  York, UK  ***  http://www.ada-europe.org ***

ATOM RSS1 RSS2