TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:36:34 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
> Another big problem with Microsoft and Ada -- they're not into
> standardization.  You can pretty much guarantee that a Microsoft Ada would
> have additional features not permitted by the standard and would ignore
> features that are required by the standard.  See Visual C++ for numerous
> examples.

And then they'd answer compatibility complaints with, "That's because
those other guys are not compliant with our standard."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2