TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:36:34 -0500
Reply-To: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (9 lines)
> Another big problem with Microsoft and Ada -- they're not into
> standardization.  You can pretty much guarantee that a Microsoft Ada would
> have additional features not permitted by the standard and would ignore
> features that are required by the standard.  See Visual C++ for numerous
> examples.

And then they'd answer compatibility complaints with, "That's because
those other guys are not compliant with our standard."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2