TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jeffrey Carter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:31:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Jeffrey Carter <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Roger Racine wrote:
 > I am the software task lead for a new project.  I (of course)
 > selected Ada as the language, to decrease the cost and schedule risk
 > for this part of the project.  Unfortunately, as soon as the top
 > three people (Program Manager, Technical Director, and a systems
 > engineer) at my company found out about it, they immediately thought
 > I had increased the risk, and asked for justification for using what
 > was thought to be unproven technology.

What technology do they consider "proven"?

 > It did help to show that the front end was used by many compiler
 > vendors (and all targets for the required vendor's Ada compilers) and
 > the back end is used by the vendor's C compiler (which is well
 > trusted).

C is proven technology. Proven to increase errors and costs, compared to
Ada.

--
Jeff Carter
"Sheriff murdered, crops burned, stores looted,
people stampeded, and cattle raped."
Blazing Saddles

ATOM RSS1 RSS2