TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:53:16 -0400
Reply-To:
Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<1783411C46BCD21182E20008C7EAA09201A15200@coeis01nok> from "[log in to unmask]" at Oct 05, 2000 07:23:04 PM
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
[said Colin]
>
> |Colin Paul Gloster <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> |
> | Well who's this!? I was reading some of a website on how to write
> | unmaintainable code ("How to Write Unmaintainable Code",
> | HTTP://mindprod.com/unmain.html) and found this:
> |
> | "2.Avoid Ada: About 20% of these techniques can't be used in Ada. Refuse
> | to use Ada. If your manager presses you, insist that no-one else uses it,
> | and point out that it doesn't work with your large suite of tools like
> lint and plummer
> | that work around C's failings."
>
I think that's great advice for writing _unmaintainable_ code. This
site is interesting - it's full of sarcastic stuff that quotes every
bit of idiocy we've ever run into in this business. Very cool.:-)

That paragraph (2) is, actually, a rather effective and complimentary
view of Ada. Right on!

Mike Feldman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2