TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Mar 1998 15:50:58 -0800
Reply-To:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Bryce Bardin <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Amen, brother!

I have recently changed my ISP and, therefore my e-mail address.
Plop, plop, fizz, fizz.  Oh what a relief it is!

I have to agree with Hal however:  Let's stay with the list server.
So far the signal to noise ratio is very high.

Bryce Bardin

AdaWorks wrote:
>
> I agree that the comp.lang.ada.advocacy would be a good approach.  The
> problem is that such a group potentially precipitates interminable
> inane arguments from anti-Ada gremlins that are absent from the
> current advocacy Listserve for  Team-Ada.
>
> Actually, if the ratio of spam to content does not reverse itself soon,
> I am seriously considering a return to snail-mail.  Postage stamps and
> the U.S. Postal Service is looking more and more attractive when I open
> my email inbox and find sixty or more advertisements for pornography,
> get-rich quick, and offers to reserach my geneaology.  Sighhhhhhhhhh.
>
> Richard Riehle
>
> [log in to unmask]
> AdaWorks Software Engineering
> Suite 30
> 2555 Park Boulevard
> Palo Alto, CA 94306
> (650) 328-1815
> FAX  328-1112

ATOM RSS1 RSS2