TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Sep 1998 12:56:55 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>I have seen an argument that Ada is not OO because it uses syntax like
>
>method_name (object_name, args ...)  instead of
>object_name.method_name(args ...)


I usually ask them what exactly OO is, and get the normal rattle of

        dynamic dispatching
        inheritance
        encapsulation
        etc.

(they never say syntax)

You can then casually note that syntax is not on their list :-), and ask
them why this is.


Dale

ATOM RSS1 RSS2