TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: What the competition looks like (resurrected)
From: Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 07:33:01 -0400
X-To: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To: Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (14 lines) 
Tom Moran wrote:

> ... Ada is technically
> superior to C for reliable software, which few want, and perhaps
> for embedded software, for which there are few Ada 95 compilers.

One small correction:

Most sizable embedded systems use either 68K, PowerPC, or
Intel architecture.  There are plenty of Ada 95 compilers for
these chips.

-Tucker Taft  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2