TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Apr 2000 07:33:01 -0400
X-To:
Reply-To:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Tom Moran wrote:

> ... Ada is technically
> superior to C for reliable software, which few want, and perhaps
> for embedded software, for which there are few Ada 95 compilers.

One small correction:

Most sizable embedded systems use either 68K, PowerPC, or
Intel architecture.  There are plenty of Ada 95 compilers for
these chips.

-Tucker Taft  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2