TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 May 2000 13:47:42 +1000
Reply-To:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization:
Canon Information Systems Research Australia
From:
Geoff Bull <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Johnson Phillip E wrote:
>
> >   Arrogant-Bastard wrote:
> >      specifically the design-by-committee approach

> I have always found this particularly funny when espoused by a C++ advocate.
> The look on their face when I show them a copy of a report from the AT&T C++
> language Committee is priceless.  They do not want to comment on C++
> enhancements being designed by committee.


And C99 draft standard I have is labelled "Committee Draft".
A-B will have to stick with K&R C.

BTW, using page count as a metric, C99 has a bloat factor almost identical
to that of Ada95.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2