TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
W. Wesley Groleau x4923
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:34:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> Contrary to popular belief, the authors are very familiar with the
> "round-trip" engineering support provided by the Rose and ObjectTeam
> products for Ada/UML. We experienced similar results using both, the issue
> is not the tools.
>
> ...
>
> There are many cases when these child packages *do not* warrant
> representation as classes .....
>
> .....  In my opinion, insults and antagonistic commentary are not
> welcome here and are counterproductive.  It also seems as if people are
> commenting without even having read the subject article.  I would recommend
> doing so to keep the discussions focused.

So, someone misreported the content of the article, and the rest of us
(myself included) believed him/her.  Please accept my apology, and I hope
I speak for the group.

Still, most of the messages provided good answers--though apparently for
the wrong question.

--
Wes Groleau

"Microsoft is not the answer.  Microsoft is the question.  The answer is "NO."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2