Tue, 13 Oct 1998 09:29:07 EDT
From the Letter to the Editor, Crosstalk: The Journal of Defense Software
Engineering, October 1998:
In an article aimed at metrics novices, it is very important to
point out some of th eknown hazards of software metrics. The fact
that lines of code can't be used to measure economic p roductivity
is definitely a known hazard that should be stressed.
In a comparative study of 10 version of the same period using 10
different programming languages (Ada 83, Ada95, C, C++, Objective C,
PL/I, Assembler, CHILL, Pascal and Smalltalk), the lines of code
metric failed to show either the highest productivity or best
quality. Overall the lowest cost and fewest defects were found in
Smalltalk and Ada95, but the lines of code metric favored
assembler. Function points correctly identified Smalltalk and Ada95
as being superior, but lines of code failed to do this.
Software Productivity Reserach
OK, guys - spin it!
-- Karl --