TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Feb 1997 09:14:56 EST
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>; from "Hal Hart" at Feb 11, 97 4:41 pm
X-To:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
:> So, anyone got a product to point me to?  (Short of buying Rational
:> Rose for both Ada & C++, using the reverse capability of the latter,
:> assuming their language-neutral design representation really works,
:> and then generate Ada from the former ... )

Define "language-neutral."  Rose's representations are clearly "C++
influenced".  And the code generation only generates the easy parts--
you still have to write the logic yourself.  (Teamwork/Ada is the same).
If reverse engineering works (BIG IF) you might get a usable model with
C++ logic in text objects which get pasted into the appropriate (hopefully)
places in the generated Ada skeletons.

And don't even ask me how much fun it is to fight Rose's user interface!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)                                Office: 219-429-4923
Hughes Defense Communications (MS 10-41)                 Home: 219-471-7206
Fort Wayne,  IN   46808                  (Unix): [log in to unmask]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2