TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:15:52 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
> however, if you consider that even the simplest feature takes
> at least -say- one week to implement, test, document etc, adding these features would have delayed the appearance of compilers by
> several years.

I understand this viewpoint very well.
I, as a programmer by profession, stuggle with "nice-to-have"
from customers :-)

>As pretty as you proposal may seem, I think it does not pass through this filter.

Thank you for comments.

Probably the point of decision would depend on how these merits is to be
evaluated in the community.

Toshitaka KUMANO wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merits :
>
>   -  The extension makes the language more orthogonal.
>   -  The extension helps programmer, typically, to write some rigorous
>      test driver for numeric computation, or so.

P.S.

I am an enthusiast for Ada over ten years. And feel very sad about
the recent decline of Ada popularity...
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2