TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tom Moran <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Oct 1999 12:58:32 -0700
Reply-To:
Tom Moran <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
The current (Oct 99) issue of Communications of the ACM has an
article "UMLoquent Expression of AWACS Software Design" in which
the authors talk about UML <-> Ada and say things like "There is
currently no known means ..."  and "We know of no means..."
about generating Ada from UML or UML from Ada.  The fact the
authors know "no means" may reflect their own limitations, but
will probably be taken by readers to mean "Ada and UML don't work
together".  Could those who know this subject please comment.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2