TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Samuel Tardieu <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Mar 1998 15:32:26 -0800
Reply-To:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines)
I agree that the comp.lang.ada.advocacy would be a good approach.  The
problem is that such a group potentially precipitates interminable
inane arguments from anti-Ada gremlins that are absent from the
current advocacy Listserve for  Team-Ada.

Actually, if the ratio of spam to content does not reverse itself soon,
I am seriously considering a return to snail-mail.  Postage stamps and
the U.S. Postal Service is looking more and more attractive when I open
my email inbox and find sixty or more advertisements for pornography,
get-rich quick, and offers to reserach my geneaology.  Sighhhhhhhhhh.

Richard Riehle


[log in to unmask]
AdaWorks Software Engineering
Suite 30
2555 Park Boulevard
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(650) 328-1815
FAX  328-1112

ATOM RSS1 RSS2